ISO 22502:2020

Simplified design of connections of concrete claddings to concrete structures

The present document refers to the panel-to-structure and panel-to panel connections used for the cladding systems of reinforced concrete frame structures of single-storey buildings, typically precast. They can be used also for multi-storey buildings with proper modifications. The fastening devices considered in the present document consist mainly of steel elements or sliding connectors. Dissipative devices with friction or plastic behaviour are also considered. Other types of common supports and bond connections are treated where needed. The use of any other existing fastening types or the connections with different characteristics than those described in the following clauses is not allowed unless comparable experimental and analytical studies do provide the necessary data and verify the design methodology for the particular type.

Titre manque

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 02-Aug-2020
• ICS: 91.080.40 - Concrete structures
• Technical Committee: ISO/TC 71/SC 5 - Simplified design standard for concrete structures
• Drafting Committee: ISO/TC 71/SC 5 - Simplified design standard for concrete structures
• Current Stage: 6060 - International Standard published
• Start Date: 03-Aug-2020
• Due Date: 21-Jul-2020
• Completion Date: 03-Aug-2020

Standards Content (Sample)

INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 22502
First edition
2020-08
Simplified design of connections
of concrete claddings to concrete
structures
Reference number
ISO 22502:2020(E)
©
ISO 2020

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO 2020
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope .1
2 Normative references .1
3 Terms and definitions .1
4 Generalities .1
4.1 Cladding panel orientations . 1
4.2 Design criteria to connect frame and panels . 3
4.2.1 Isostatic approach. 3
4.2.2 Integrated approach . 3
4.2.3 Dissipative approach . 3
4.3 Strategies to implement isostatic and dissipative design criteria . 4
4.3.1 Sliding-frame (SF) . 4
4.3.2 Double-hinged pendulum (DHP) . 4
4.3.3 Rocking panel (RP) . 4
4.4 Parameters . 5
4.5 Classification . 5
5 Isostatic systems .5
5.1 General . 5
5.2 Analysis of the building . 5
5.2.1 General. 5
5.2.2 Suggestions for the structural model . 5
5.2.3 Rocking systems . 6
5.3 Analysis of conventional systems . 8
5.3.1 General aspects . 8
5.3.2 General design methodology . 8
5.3.3 Application procedure . 9
5.4 Design of isostatic system connections .12
5.4.1 General.12
5.4.2 Structural arrangements .12
5.4.3 Sliding devices.15
5.4.4 Hinge connections .16
5.4.5 Supports with steel brackets .17
6 Design of conventional connections .18
6.1 General .18
6.2 Structural arrangements .18
6.2.1 Vertical structural arrangements .18
6.2.2 Horizontal structural arrangements .19
6.3 Conventional fastening systems .20
6.3.1 General.20
6.3.2 Hammerhead strap connection .20
6.3.3 Cantilever box connection .27
6.3.4 Steel angle connections .31
6.4 Conventional strengthening and fastening systems .34
6.4.1 Second line back up devices .34
6.4.2 Strengthening folded steel plates .36
6.4.3 Strengthening with steel cushions .37
7 Integrated systems .38
7.1 General .38
7.2 Analysis of the buildings .38
7.2.1 General.38
7.2.2 Behaviour factor .39
© ISO 2020 – All rights reserved iii

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

7.2.3 Design aspects .39
7.2.4 Structural modelling .39
7.2.5 Cladding panels detailing .44
7.3 Design of integrated systems connections .45
7.3.1 General.45
7.3.2 Structural arrangements .45
7.3.3 Base supports .47
7.3.4 Connections with protruding bars .47
7.3.5 Connections with wall shoes .50
7.3.6 Connections with bolted plates .54
7.3.7 Shear keys .58
8 Dissipative systems .59
8.1 General .59
8.2 Analysis of the building .60
8.2.1 General.60
8.2.2 Structures with friction devices.62
8.2.3 Structures with steel cushions .63
8.3 Design of dissipative systems connections .64
8.3.1 General.64
8.3.2 Structural arrangements .65
8.3.3 Friction devices .66
8.3.4 Multi-slit devices .70
8.3.5 Steel cushions .73
8.3.6 Folded steel plates .80
Annex A (informative) Design flowchart .83
iv © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www .iso .org/
iso/ foreword .html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 71, Concrete, reinforced concrete and
prestressed concrete, Subcommittee SC 5, Simplified design standard for concrete structures.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www .iso .org/ members .html.
© ISO 2020 – All rights reserved v

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

Introduction
The current design practice of reinforced concrete buildings, most commonly precast, is based on a
frame model, where the peripheral cladding panels enter only as masses without any stiffness. The
panels are then connected to the structure with fastenings dimensioned with a local calculation based
on their mass for anchorage forces orthogonal to the plane of the panels.
Furthermore, the seismic force reduction in the type of reinforced concrete structures of concern relies
on energy dissipation in plastic hinges formed in the columns. Very large drifts of the columns are
needed to activate this energy dissipation foreseen in design. However, typically, the capacity of the
connections between cladding and structure is exhausted well before such large drifts can develop.
Therefore, the design of these connections cannot rely on the seismic reduction factor typically used for
design of the bare structure.
This document contains a set of practical provisions for the design of mechanical connections of
concrete claddings to concrete structures under seismic actions as well as suggestions for structural
analysis for the specified systems.
vi © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 22502:2020(E)
Simplified design of connections of concrete claddings to
concrete structures
1 Scope
The present document refers to the panel-to-structure and panel-to panel connections used for the
cladding systems of reinforced concrete frame structures of single-storey buildings, typically precast.
They can be used also for multi-storey buildings with proper modifications.
The fastening devices considered in the present document consist mainly of steel elements or sliding
connectors. Dissipative devices with friction or plastic behaviour are also considered. Other types of
common supports and bond connections are treated where needed.
The use of any other existing fastening types or the connections with different characteristics than
those described in the following clauses is not allowed unless comparable experimental and analytical
studies do provide the necessary data and verify the design methodology for the particular type.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 20987, Simplified design for mechanical connections between precast concrete structural elements in
buildings
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
behaviour factor q
q factor by which the elastic design spectrum in linear analysis is reduced
Note 1 to entry: Directly or indirectly linked to the ductility and deformation demands on members and
connections.
4 Generalities
4.1 Cladding panel orientations
Figure 1 a) shows a vertical panel orientation referred to a system of orthogonal axes, where x is
oriented horizontally in the panel plane, y is oriented orthogonally to that plane and z is oriented
vertically parallel to the gravity loads. The origin is placed in a corner at the base side of the panel.
Four connections are foreseen at the corners of the panel, indicated respectively by A, B, C and D. Any one
of these connections is intended to give only translational restraints without any rotational restraint. E
© ISO 2020 – All rights reserved 1

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

and F indicate the possible joint connections with the adjacent panels. Usually, the connections A and B
are attached to the foundation beam, the connections C and D are attached to the top beam.
The couple of bottom and top connections may be replaced by single connections placed in the middle
of the bottom and top sides for a pendulum arrangement of the panel. In this case, the connections are
respectively named A and C, and the symbols B and D are omitted.
In Figure 1 b), the same reference system is associated with a horizontal panel for which the connections
A, B, C and D are usually attached to the columns, and E and F refer to the possible joint connections
with the adjacent panels, foundation or top beam where the uncertain friction effect can act due to the
superimposed panels.
a)  Vertical b)  Horizontal
Figure 1 — Cladding panel orientations
Table 1 — Symbols and graphic schemes for supports
Symbol Description Graphic scheme
     ▼
f fixed (bilateral)
►◄,▲
f+ fixed (unilateral in + direction) ▲, ►
f- fixed (unilateral in - direction) ▼, ◄
s sliding (bilateral) ↔, ↕
d dissipative ⋀⋀⋀
/ omitted [empty]
Table 1 gives a general description of the symbols and graphic schemes regarding the effect of the
supports along the three directions x, y and z. As an example, Table 2 gives the arrangement matrix
indicating the effect of the supports for a vertical panel.
2 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

Table 2 — Arrangement matrix – example
Direction A B C D E F
x f / s / f f
y f / f / / /
z f / / / d d
The term “fixed” is used with reference to the restrained linear displacement while the rotational
restraints are not provided.
4.2 Design criteria to connect frame and panels
4.2.1 Isostatic approach
An isostatic arrangement of panel connections is able to allow without reactions the large displacements
expected for the frame structure under earthquake conditions. Very large displacement capacities are
required for connectors with this choice.
The frame deformation demand is allowed by a relative clearance that uncouples the motion of frame
and panels. The two systems are kinematically uncoupled, except for the out-of-plane displacements
[see Figure 2 a)].
4.2.2 Integrated approach
An integrated arrangement relies on fixed connections that integrate the panels in the resistant
structural assembly with a dual wall-frame system behaviour. High forces may arise in the connections
with this choice.
Panels and frame have a coupled motion: the system is kinematically paired [see Figure 2 b)]. Panels
become part of the seismic resisting system and they act as the main restraints in the horizontal
direction thanks to their higher stiffness. As a consequence, the connections shall be over-proportioned
to carry the higher loads transferred by the frame, according to capacity design rules.
4.2.3 Dissipative approach
An arrangement of dissipative connections between the panels is added to an isostatic system of
fastenings to the structure, able to maintain displacements and forces within lower predetermined limits.
Specific devices can balance the overall building response, reducing the displacement and keeping the
load below an imposed threshold, determined by the connections themselves [see Figure 2 c)]. Like in
the isostatic configuration, the systems are kinematically uncoupled but they are also constrained by
inelastic links, like friction or yielding devices. The joints between structure and panels – or among the
panels – shall be designed to dissipate energy during the seismic action.
© ISO 2020 – All rights reserved 3

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

a) b) c)
Figure 2 — Design criteria to connect frame and panels
4.3 Strategies to implement isostatic and dissipative design criteria
4.3.1 Sliding-frame (SF)
Like an ideal uncoupled system, the isostatic sliding-frame is, in principle, the easiest way to disconnect
frame and panels. To achieve this result while avoiding the issues that affect current systems, proper
connections (sliders) shall be introduced. They only restrain out-of-plane motions, reproducing the
hypothesis typically assumed in the current practice, but in a safer way [see Figure 3 a)].
4.3.2 Double-hinged pendulum (DHP)
The double-hinged pendulum is the proper way to connect the cladding as simple mass without any
stiffness contribution [see Figure 3 b)]. This result can be obtained either by connecting panel edges
with hinges, or by replacing the top hinge with coupled sliders.
4.3.3 Rocking panel (RP)
Starting from DHP, the rocking panel configuration may be obtained replacing the bottom hinge with
a pair of horizontal restraints. These leave the panel free to rock around its bottom corners. Even
though this solution looks very similar to the former one, some differences in statics and in kinematic
behaviour need to be highlighted [see Figure 3 c)].
a) b) c)
Figure 3 — Isostatic and dissipative design criteria: schemes of design strategies
4 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISO 22502:2020(E)

4.4 Parameters
ISO 20987 shall apply. In addition to the provisions of ISO 20987, the following applies.
Among the main parameters that characterize the seismic behaviour of the connection, the following
one is added:
slide - free linear relative displacement capacity with null or negligible reaction.
The main behaviour parameters are provided for each x, y, z direction defined in ISO 20987 specifying
possible interaction effects.
4.5 Classification
ISO 20987 shall apply. In addition to the provisions of ISO 20987, the following applies.
Connections present in existing buildings, where sufficient information about their strength and/or
ductility is not available, can be classified as unknown.
Existing connections can be classified as insufficient when a specific calculation under the expected
seismic action shows their inadequate strength.
5 Isostatic systems
5.1 General
For buildings with isostatic arrangements of cladding panel connections, the structural analysis
under seismic action shall refer to the frame system following the conventional design practice of such
structures. In expectation of large displacements, the second order effects, PΔ, should be taken into
account. In addition to the ordinary output data used for the design of member resistance at ultimate
1)
limit state (ULS ), the sliding or rotation displacements shall be provided for the design of the pertinent
capacities of panel connection devices.
5.2 Analysis of the building
5.2.1 General
For the frame systems considered, capacity design criteria for the proportioning of the connection are
applied. It is assumed, as a rule, that the beam-to-column and column-to-foundation connections are
properly over-proportioned with respect to the bending moment ultimate capacities of the columns.
Floor connections involved in the diaphragm action can refer to some approximate methods.
In any case, the structural connections can be over-proportioned, referring to the forces obtained from
a structural analysis performed with behaviour factor q = 1,5
Figure A.1 shows a simplified design flowchart. It shows the required steps to design a cladding to
concrete structure connection. Specific suggestions regarding the isostatic systems structural model
analysis are given in 5.2.2 and 5.2.3.
5.2.2 Suggestions for the structural model
For the numerical model of the structure, the ordinary linear elements (beam type) can be used,
positioned along the axis of the members. Different eccentricities between the members should be
reproduced using link rigid elements at their joints. The connections between the elements shall be
faithfully represented with their degrees of freedom in the different planes. It should be considered
that, if the connections are modelled with no deformability (e.g. fixed built-in full support or hinged
1) ULS: state at which the material stresses are limited to the point at which the bearing elements can withstand
the design loads and maintain the safety and integrity of the structure.
© ISO 2020 – All rights reserved 5

----
...