SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
(Amendment)Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 4-2: Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling - Measurement instrumentation uncertainty - Conducted disturbance measurements
Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 4-2: Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling - Measurement instrumentation uncertainty - Conducted disturbance measurements
Anforderungen an Geräte und Einrichtungen sowie Festlegung der Verfahren zur Messung der hochfrequenten Störaussendung (Funkstörungen) und Störfestigkeit - Teil 4-2: Unsicherheiten, Statistik und Modelle zur Ableitung von Grenzwerten (Störmodell) - Messgeräte-Unsicherheit
Spécifications des méthodes et des appareils de mesure des perturbations radioélectriques et de l'immunité aux perturbations radioélectriques - Partie 4-2: Incertitudes, statistiques et modélisation des limites - Incertitudes de mesure de l'instrumentation
Specifikacija za merilne naprave in metode za merjenje radijskih motenj in odpornosti - 4-2. del: Modeliranje negotovosti, statistike in mejnih vrednosti - Negotovost merilnih instrumentov - Dopolnilo A2
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
01-december-2018
Specifikacija za merilne naprave in metode za merjenje radijskih motenj in
odpornosti - 4-2. del: Modeliranje negotovosti, statistike in mejnih vrednosti -
Negotovost merilnih instrumentov - Dopolnilo A2
Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods -
Part 4-2: Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling - Measurement instrumentation
uncertainty - Conducted disturbance measurements
Anforderungen an Geräte und Einrichtungen sowie Festlegung der Verfahren zur
Messung der hochfrequenten Störaussendung (Funkstörungen) und Störfestigkeit - Teil
4-2: Unsicherheiten, Statistik und Modelle zur Ableitung von Grenzwerten (Störmodell) -
Messgeräte-Unsicherheit
Spécifications des méthodes et des appareils de mesure des perturbations
radioélectriques et de l'immunité aux perturbations radioélectriques - Partie 4-2:
Incertitudes, statistiques et modélisation des limites - Incertitudes de mesure de
l'instrumentation
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
ICS:
17.220.20 0HUMHQMHHOHNWULþQLKLQ Measurement of electrical
PDJQHWQLKYHOLþLQ and magnetic quantities
33.100.01 Elektromagnetna združljivost Electromagnetic compatibility
na splošno in general
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
EUROPEAN STANDARD EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
October 2018
ICS 33.100.10; 33.100.20
English Version
Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring
apparatus and methods - Part 4-2: Uncertainties, statistics and
limit modelling - Measurement instrumentation uncertainty
(CISPR 16-4-2:2011/A2:2018)
Spécifications des méthodes et des appareils de mesure Anforderungen an Geräte und Einrichtungen sowie
des perturbations radioélectriques et de l'immunité aux Festlegung der Verfahren zur Messung der hochfrequenten
perturbations radioélectriques - Partie 4-2: Incertitudes, Störaussendung (Funkstörungen) und Störfestigkeit - Teil 4-
statistiques et modélisation des limites - Incertitudes de 2: Unsicherheiten, Statistik und Modelle zur Ableitung von
mesure de l'instrumentation Grenzwerten (Störmodell) - Messgeräte-Unsicherheit
(CISPR 16-4-2:2011/A2:2018) (CISPR 16-4-2:2011/A2:2018)
This amendment A2 modifies the European Standard EN 55016-4-2:2011; it was approved by CENELEC on 2018-09-19. CENELEC
members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this amendment the
status of a national standard without any alteration.
Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC
Management Centre or to any CENELEC member.
This amendment exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the
responsibility of a CENELEC member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same status as
the official versions.
CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic,
Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization
Comité Européen de Normalisation Electrotechnique
Europäisches Komitee für Elektrotechnische Normung
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2018 CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC Members.
Ref. No. EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018 E
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018 (E)
European foreword
The text of document CISPR/A/1257/FDIS, future CISPR 16-4-2/A2, prepared by CISPR SC A "Radio-
interference measurements and statistical methods" of CISPR "International special committee on
radio interference" was submitted to the IEC-CENELEC parallel vote and approved by CENELEC as
EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018.
The following dates are fixed:
• latest date by which the document has to be implemented at national (dop) 2019-06-19
level by publication of an identical national standard or by endorsement
• latest date by which the national standards conflicting with the (dow) 2021-09-19
document have to be withdrawn
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CENELEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CENELEC by the European
Commission and the European Free Trade Association.
Endorsement notice
The text of the International Standard CISPR 16-4-2:2011/A2:2018 was approved by CENELEC as a
European Standard without any modification.
In the official version, for Bibliography, the following notes have to be added for the standards
indicated:
CISPR 16-1-4:2010 NOTE Harmonized as EN 55016-1-4:2010 (not modified)
CISPR 16-1-6:2014 NOTE Harmonized as EN 55016-1-6:2015 (not modified)
CISPR 32:2015 NOTE Harmonized as EN 55032:2015 (not modified)
2
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018 (E)
Annex ZA
(normative)
Normative references to international publications
with their corresponding European publications
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments)
applies.
NOTE 1 Where an International Publication has been modified by common modifications, indicated by (mod), the relevant
EN/HD applies.
NOTE 2 Up-to-date information on the latest versions of the European Standards listed in this annex is available here:
www.cenelec.eu.
Publication Year Title EN/HD Year
CISPR 16-2-3 2016 Specification for radio disturbance and immunity EN 55016-2-3 2017
measuring apparatus and methods - Part 2-3:
Methods of measurement of disturbances and
immunity - Radiated disturbance measurements
3
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
CISPR 16-4-2
®
Edition 2.0 2018-08
INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD
NORME
INTERNATIONALE
INTERNATIONAL SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON RADIO INTERFERENCE
COMITÉ INTERNATIONAL SPÉCIAL DES PERTURBATIONS RADIOÉLECTRIQUES
BASIC EMC PUBLICATION
PUBLICATION FONDAMENTALE EN CEM
AMENDMENT 2
AMENDEMENT 2
Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus
and methods –
Part 4-2: Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling – Measurement
instrumentation uncertainty
Spécifications des méthodes et des appareils de mesure des perturbations
radioélectriques et de l'immunité aux perturbations radioélectriques –
Partie 4-2: Incertitudes, statistiques et modélisation des limites – Incertitudes
de mesure de l’instrumentation
INTERNATIONAL
ELECTROTECHNICAL
COMMISSION
COMMISSION
ELECTROTECHNIQUE
INTERNATIONALE
ICS 33.100.10; 33.100.20 ISBN 978-2-8322-5920-7
Warning! Make sure that you obtained this publication from an authorized distributor.
Attention! Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez obtenu cette publication via un distributeur agréé.
® Registered trademark of the International Electrotechnical Commission
Marque déposée de la Commission Electrotechnique Internationale
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
– 2 – CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018
© IEC 2018
FOREWORD
This amendment has been prepared by subcommittee CISPR subcommittee A: Radio-
interference measurements and statistical methods, of IEC CISPR committee: International
special committee on radio interference.
The text of this amendment is based on the following documents:
FDIS Report on voting
CISPR/A/1257/FDIS CISPR/A/1259/RVD
Full information on the voting for the approval of this amendment can be found in the report
on voting indicated in the above table.
The committee has decided that the contents of this amendment and the base publication will
remain unchanged until the stability date indicated on the IEC website under
"http://webstore.iec.ch" in the data related to the specific publication. At this date, the
publication will be
• reconfirmed,
• withdrawn,
• replaced by a revised edition, or
• amended.
_____________
2 Normative references
Replace the dated reference CISPR 16-2-3:2010, by the following new reference:
CISPR 16-2-3:2016, Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus
and methods – Part 2-3: Methods of measurement of disturbances and immunity – Radiated
disturbance measurements
3.1 Terms and definitions
Add, after the existing term and definition 3.1.1, the following new term and definition:
3.1.2
small EUT
equipment, either positioned on a table top or standing on the floor that, including its cables,
fits in a cylindrical test volume of 1,5 m in diameter and 1,5 m in height measured from the
floor
3.3 Abbreviations
Add, to the existing list modified by Amendment 1, the following new abbreviations:
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018 – 3 –
© IEC 2018
AN artificial network
Δ-AN artificial Δ-network (‘Δ’ is pronounced ‘delta’)
LLAS large loop antenna system
LV low voltage
V-AMN artificial mains V-network
Table 1 – Values of U
cispr
Replace the first three lines of this table, modified by Amendment 1, by the following new
lines:
Conducted disturbance at AC mains and other power ports using a V-AMN (9 kHz to 150 kHz) 3,8 dB B.1
(150 kHz to 30 MHz) 3,4 dB B.2
Conducted disturbance at AC mains ports using a voltage probe (9 kHz to 30 MHz) 2,9 dB B.3
Add, after the measurement method “Conducted disturbance at telecommunication port using
CP”, the following new line:
Conducted disturbance at telecommunication port using CP and CVP (150 kHz to 30 MHz) 4,0 dB B.5
Add before “Radiated disturbance (electric field strength at an OATS or in a SAC)” the
following new line:
Radiated disturbance (disturbance current in a LLAS) (9 kHz to 30 MHz) 3,3 dB F.1
Add, after the existing NOTE 2, the following new notes:
NOTE 3 The value of U for conducted disturbances at telecommunication ports using CP and CVP is based on
cispr
the expanded uncertainty in Table B.5 with consideration of additional uncertainties attributed to the CP transfer
admittance Y and mismatch uncertainty CP-receiver δM; see comment B18).
T
NOTE 4 The values of U for the OATS, SAC and FAR are based on a small EUT – an EUT fitting in a
cispr
cylindrical test volume of 1,5 m in diameter and 1,5 m in height – for a 3 m measurement distance (per 3.1.2).
5.1 Conducted disturbance measurements at a mains port using an AMN
Replace, in the title, the phrase "an AMN" by the phrase "a V-AMN".
5.1.1 Measurand for measurements using an AMN
Replace, in the title, the phrase "an AMN" by the phrase "a V-AMN".
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
– 4 – CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018
© IEC 2018
5.1.2 Symbols of input quantities specific to measurements using an AMN
Replace in the title the phrase "an AMN" by the phrase "a V-AMN".
Replace the line starting with δD by the following new line:
mains
δD Correction for the error caused by AC mains and other power supply disturbances,
mains
in dB
5.1.3 Input quantities to be considered for conducted disturbance measurements at a
mains port using an AMN
Replace, in the title, the phrase "an AMN" by the phrase "a V-AMN".
Replace the eighth dashed item by the following new text:
– Effect of disturbances originating from the laboratory AC mains or other power supply
Add, after the existing Subclause 5.6.3 added by Amendment 1, the following new Subclause
5.7:
5.7 Conducted disturbance measurements at AC mains and other power ports using a
Δ-AN
5.7.1 Measurand for measurements using a Δ-AN
V Asymmetric voltage in dB(μV), measured at the EUT port of the Δ-AN relative to the
reference ground plane, and also symmetric voltage between two terminals at the
EUT port of the Δ-AN not including reference ground; optionally also the
unsymmetric voltage in dB(μV), measured at the EUT port of the Δ-AN relative to
the reference ground plane, if the Δ-AN is furnished with a respective port for
connection of the measuring receiver
5.7.2 Symbols of input quantities specific to measurements using a Δ-AN
F Voltage division factor (asymmetric resp. symmetric) of the Δ-AN, in dB
AN
δF Correction for voltage division factor (VDF) frequency interpolation error, in dB
AN f
δD Correction for the error caused by AC mains and other power supply disturbances,
mains
in dB
δV Correction for the effect of the environment, in dB
env
δZ Correction for imperfect asymmetric or symmetric Δ-AN impedance, in dB
AN
5.7.3 Input quantities to be considered for conducted disturbance measurements
at AC mains and other power ports using a Δ-AN
– Receiver reading
– Attenuation of the connection between AN and receiver
– AN voltage division factor (asymmetric and symmetric)
– AN VDF frequency interpolation
– Receiver related input quantities:
• Receiver sine-wave voltage accuracy
• Receiver pulse amplitude response
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018 – 5 –
© IEC 2018
• Receiver pulse response variation with repetition frequency
• Receiver noise floor
– Mismatch effects between the AN's receiver port and receiver
– AN impedance
– Effect of disturbances originating from the laboratory AC mains or other power supply
– Effect of environment
Add, after the existing Clause 8, the following new Clause 9:
9 Radiated disturbance measurements in the frequency range 9 kHz to 30 MHz
9.1 Magnetic field disturbance measurements using the LLAS in the frequency range
9 kHz to 30 MHz (see also Clause F.1)
9.1.1 Measurand for LLAS measurements
I Current in dB(µA), measured in each of the three loops of the LLAS
9.1.2 Symbols of input quantities specific for LLAS measurements
δZ
vf
Correction for validation factor deviation, in dB
δZ
fi
Correction for validation factor frequency interpolation, in dB
9.1.3 Input quantities to be considered for LLAS measurements
– Receiver reading
– Attenuation of connecting cable between LLAS and receiver
– Validation factor deviation
– Validation factor frequency interpolation
– Receiver related input quantities:
• Receiver sine-wave voltage accuracy
• Receiver pulse amplitude response
• Receiver pulse response variation with repetition frequency
• Receiver noise floor
– Mismatch between LLAS and receiver
9.2 Magnetic field disturbance measurement in the frequency range 9 kHz to 30 MHz
using a loop antenna at various distances from the EUT
(Void)
Annex A – Basis for U values in Table 1, general information and rationale
cispr
for input quantities common to all measurement methods
A.2 Rationale for the estimates of input quantities common to all disturbance
measurements (“A” comments)
Replace, in the existing item A2) modified by Amendment 1, the abbreviation "AMN" by the
abbreviation "V-AMN".
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
– 6 – CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018
© IEC 2018
Add in the first paragraph of A2), after “AMN, AAN, CDNE, CP, CVP, VP” added by
Amendment 1, the abbreviation “LLAS”.
Add, in the first sentence of the first paragraph of item A6), the abbreviation "AN" between the
abbreviations "AMN" and "AAN". Add, in the second paragraph, the term "δF " between
AN f
respective terms for "δF " and "δF ".
AMN f VPf
Replace in the first paragraph of A6), the phrase “absorbing clamp factor and antenna factor”,
by the new phrase “absorbing clamp factor, LLAS validation factor and antenna factor”.
Replace, in item A7) a), the abbreviation "AMN" by the abbreviation "AN".
Replace, in item A7) c) Note 12, the abbreviation "AMN" by the abbreviation "AN".
Annex B – Basis for U values in Table 1, uncertainty budgets and rationale
cispr
for conducted disturbance measurements
B.1 Uncertainty budget for conducted disturbance measurements at a mains
port using an artificial mains network (AMN)
Replace the existing title by the following new title:
B.1 Uncertainty budget for conducted disturbance measurements at AC mains
ports using a V-AMN
Replace the existing Equation (B.1) by the following new equation:
V=V++A F +δF +δV +δV+δV+δV+δδM+ Z +δD +δE (B.1)
r c AN ANf sw pa pr nf AN mains
Table B.1 − Conducted disturbance measurements from 9 kHz to 150 kHz using a
50 Ω/50 μH + 5 Ω AMN
Replace, in the existing title, the abbreviation "AMN" by the new abbreviation "V-AMN".
Table B.2 − Conducted disturbance measurements from 150 kHz to 30 MHz using a
50 Ω/50 μH AMN
Replace, in the existing title, the abbreviation "AMN" by the new abbreviation "V-AMN".
B.6 Rationale for the estimates of input quantities specific to conducted
disturbance measurement methods
Replace the existing comment B10) by the following new comment:
B10) An estimate of the CVP voltage division factor F is assumed to be available from a
CVP
calibration report for the cable type to be measured, along with an expanded uncertainty and
a coverage factor. The uncertainty includes the calibration setup.
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018 – 7 –
© IEC 2018
Add, after the phrase “C.1.3 of CISPR 22:2008” in the existing comment B18), the new phrase
“and in C.4.1.6.4 of CISPR 32:2015 [19]”.
Add, after the existing Clause B.8 added by Amendment 1, the following new Clauses B.9 and
B.10:
B.9 Basis for U values in Table 1, uncertainty budgets and rationale for
cispr
conducted disturbance measurements at mains and other ports using a Δ-
AN
The measurand V is calculated using:
V=V++a F +δF +δV +δV +δV+δV+ δZ +δδM+ D +δV (B.7)
r c AN ANf sw pa pr nf AN mains env
Table B.8 − Conducted disturbances measurements from
150 kHz to 30 MHz using a 150 Ω Δ-AN
b
a X Uncertainty of x c u(x )
Input quantity i i i i
Probability
dB dB
distribution function
A1)
V
± 0,1 k = 1 0,10
Receiver reading
r
A2)
a
Cable attenuation: AN-receiver ± 0,1 k = 2 0,05
c
B25)
F
± 0,2 k = 2 0,10
AN voltage division factor
AN
Receiver corrections:
A3)
δV
± 1,0 k = 2 0,50
Sine wave voltage
sw
A4)
δV
Pulse amplitude response ± 1,5 Rectangular 0,87
pa
A4)
δV
Pulse repetition rate response ± 1,5 Rectangular 0,87
pr
A5)
δV
Noise floor proximity ± 0,0 Rectangular 0,00
nf
A6)
δF ± 0,1 Rectangular 0,06
AN VDF frequency interpolation
ANf
A7)
Mismatch AN-receiver δM ± 0,07 U-shaped 0,05
B26)
δΖ
AN Impedance (CM) tolerances + 5,37/–1,94 Triangular 1,49
AN-CM
B26)
δΖ + 5,37/–1,94 Triangular 1,49
AN Impedance (DM) tolerances
AN-DM
B27)
δD ± 0,0 0,00
Effect of mains disturbances
mains
B19)
δV
Effect of the environment
env
a
Superscripts refer to numbered comments in A.2 and in this annex.
b
All sensitivity coefficients c are assumed to be equal to 1, see A.2.
i
u
Combined standard uncertainty 2,50
c
Expanded uncertainty (U ) 2 u
4,99
CISPR c
---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
– 8 – CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018
© IEC 2018
B.10 Rationale for the estimates of input quantities specific to the measurement
method using a Δ-AN
B25) Estimates of the Δ-AN voltage division factors F (F and F )
AN AN_asymmetric AN_symmetric
are assumed to be available from a calibration report, along with their expanded
uncertainties and coverage factors.
B26) CISPR 16-1-2 defines the CM impedance of the 150 Ω Δ-AN as 150 Ω with a
magnitude tolerance of ±30 Ω and a phase tolerance of ± 40°. Taking the extremes of
all combinations of the constrained AN CM impedance and the unconstrained EUT
impedance the estimate of the correction δZ is zero with a deviation of
AN-CM
+ 5,37/– 1,94 dB. A triangular probability distribution is assumed because there is
only a small chance of encountering the particular combinations of AN impedance
and EUT impedance needed to produce those extremes. The triangular distribution is
assumed to be symmetric.
The actual uncertainty will be reduced if the actual CM impedance does not reach the
tolerance limits.
CISPR 16-1-2 defines the DM impedance of the 150 Ω Δ-AN as 150 Ω with a
magnitude tolerance of ± 30 Ω and a phase tolerance of ±40°. Taking the extremes of
all combinations of the constrained AN differential mode impedance and the
is zero with a
unconstrained EUT impedance the estimate of the correction δZ
AN-DM
deviation of +5,37/–1,94 dB. A triangular probability distribution is assumed because
there is only a small chance of encountering the particular combinations of AN
impedance and EUT impedance needed to produce those extremes. The triangular
distribution is assumed to be symmetric.
The actual uncertainty will be reduced if the actual DM impedance does not reach the
tolerance limits.
B27) For measurements using a Δ-AN, disturbances from the AC mains, other kind of
power supply or from an external load are assumed to be suppressed by the Δ-AN
itself or by additional filters inserted in the power supply line – if necessary.
Annex D – Basis for U values in Table 1 – Radiated disturbance
cispr
measurements from 30 MHz to 1 000 MHz
Table D.1 – Horizontally polarized radiated disturbances from 30 MHz to 200 MHz
using a biconical antenna at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Replace the table title by the following new title:
Table D.1 – Horizontally polarized radiated disturbances from 30 MHz to 200 MHz using
a biconical antenna at an OATS/SAC at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Table D.2 – Vertically polarized radiated disturbances from 30 MHz to 200 MHz
using a biconical antenna at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Replace the table title by the following new title:
Table D.2 – Vertically polarized radiated disturbances from 30 MHz to 200 MHz using
a biconical antenna at an OATS/SAC at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Table D.3 – Horizontally polarized radiated disturbances from 200 MHz to 1 GHz using
an LPDA antenna at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Replace the table title by the following new title:
---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018 – 9 –
© IEC 2018
Table D.3 – Horizontally polarized radiated disturbances from 200 MHz to 1 GHz using
an LPDA antenna at an OATS/SAC at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Replace, in the “LPDA antenna corrections” section of the table, the “Phase centre location
D4)
” details as follows:
D4)
δF
3 m Rectangular 0,12
Phase centre location at ± 0,20
aph
δF
or 10 m ± 0,06 Rectangular 0,03
aph
δF
or 30 m ± 0,02 Rectangular 0,01
aph
Replace the expanded uncertainty details located just below Table D.3 by the following:
5,12dB, at a separation of 3 m (with tilting)
5,21 dB, at a separation of 3 m (without tilting)
U(E)= 2u (E)=
Hence, expanded uncertainty c
5,20 dB, at a separation of 10 m
5,19 dB, at a separation of 30 m
Table D.4 – Vertically polarized radiated disturbances from 200 MHz to 1 GHz using an
LPDA antenna at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Replace the table title by the following new title:
Table D.4 – Vertically polarized radiated disturbances from 200 MHz to 1 GHz using an
LPDA antenna at an OATS/SAC at a distance of 3 m, 10 m or 30 m
Replace, in the “LPDA antenna corrections” section of the table, the “Phase centre location
D4)
” details as follows:
D4)
δF
Phase centre location at 3 m ± 0,20 Rectangular 0,12
aph
δF
or 10 m ± 0,06 Rectangular 0,03
aph
δF
or 30 m Rectangular 0,01
± 0,02
aph
Replace the expanded uncertainty details located just below Table D.4 by the following:
5,14 dB, at a separation of 3 m (with tilting)
6,21 dB, at a separation of 3 m (without tilting)
U(E)= 2u (E)=
Hence, expanded uncertainty
c
5,21 dB, at a separation of 10 m
5,18 dB, at a separation of 30 m
D.3 Rationale for the estimates of input quantities specific to radiated
disturbance measurement methods from 30 MHz to 1 000 MHz
Replace, in comment D4), all of the existing text and notes by the following new text and
notes:
D4) The correction δF for phase centre location is negligible for a biconical antenna. The
aph
variation in phase-centre location with frequency for an LPDA antenna can be corrected
as recommended in CISPR 16-2-3.
---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
– 10 – CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018
© IEC 2018
For an LPDA antenna, the correction δF was assumed to be applied e.g. by
aph
equivalent corrections of the AFs for the specified measurement distance (see
CISPR 16-2-3). The remaining reduced uncertainty is given in Tables D.3 and D.4 with a
rectangular probability distribution, having a half-width evaluated by considering the
effect of an error of ± 0,07 m in the separation, and assuming that field strength is
inversely proportional to separation. For example for d = 10 m,
20 lg(1 + 0,07/10) = 0,06 dB.
NOTE 4 If a tuned dipole is the measuring antenna, the correction δF is negligible.
aph
NOTE 5 For hybrid antennas, the correction δF for the systematic effect is more complicated [see
aph
comment D12)].
nd
Replace, in comment D11) 2 paragraph, the existing text “Subclause 7.2.3 of
CISPR 16-2-3:2010”, by the following new text:
Subclause 7.3.4 of CISPR 16-2-3:2016
Replace, in comment D12), all of the existing text, equations and notes by the following new
text, equations, notes and tables:
D12) Hybrid antennas are taken into account in the calculation of Tables D.7, D.8 and D.9.
Hybrid antennas, used for radiated disturbance measurements in the frequency range
30 MHz to 1 000 MHz and consisting of a broadband dipole section and an LPDA
antenna section, typically have the following characteristics (different parameters for
specific designs may be provided by antenna manufacturers):
– a frequency range up to about 100 MHz, where the antenna acts like a biconical
antenna (see Tables D.1, D.2 and D.5);
– a transition frequency range from about 100 MHz up to about 200 MHz (see below
within this comment); and
– a frequency range above about 200 MHz where the antenna acts like an LPDA
antenna (see Tables D.3, D.4 and D.6). For the correction δF it is considered that
adir
the LPDA part is usually closer to the EUT than above in comment D3), which means
that the correction factors are slightly higher and the uncertainties are slightly larger.
In the frequency range up to 100 MHz, the following is assumed:
– the AF variation relative to F for horizontal polarization at a height of 1 m reaches a
a
maximum vs. frequency of ± 2 dB around 60 MHz and at a height of 4 m the variation
is around ± 0,5 dB (data specific for individual antenna types need to be supplied by
the antenna manufacturer). Since at horizontal polarization the antenna height for
OATS/SAC measurements in the frequency range below 100 MHz is at its maximum,
the lower AF height deviation has been assumed.
In the transition frequency range, the following may be assumed for uncertainty
considerations:
– the antenna gain (in dBi) and, by association, the pattern directivity (in dB), increase
linearly with the frequency (detailed antenna patterns for the correction δF may be
adir
obtained from the manufacturer);
– as the frequency increases, the active phase centre travels linearly from the
broadband dipole elements to the 200 MHz elements of the LPDA part [a detailed
calculation of the AF correction δF is given below in Equation (D.4)];
aph
– the cross polarization suppression is equal to or above 20 dB; and
– the balun imbalance will normally be as low as that of the broadband dipole
elements.
---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------
SIST EN 55016-4-2:2011/A2:2018
CISPR 16-4-2:2011/AMD2:2018 – 11 –
© IEC 2018
It is assumed that the antenna is provided with free-space AFs. Free-space AFs apply
to the location of the phase centre. Because the phase centre location on the antenna is
frequency dependent, the distance from a fixed EUT is also frequency dependent.
Equation (8) of CISPR 16-2-3:2016, as well as Equation (A.1) of CISPR 16-1-6:2014 [18],
suggests a field-strength correction. For a given frequency, the following correction, ΔE in dB,
is added to the measured electric field strength:
d
phase d+ Δd
ΔE= 20 lg = 20lg
d d
(D.3)
According to a note in CISPR 16-2-3 this correction can also be done u
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.