ISO/TC 292/WG 6 - Protective security

This document specifies impact performance requirements for a vehicle security barrier (VSB) and a test method for rating its performance when subjected to a single impact by a test vehicle not driven by a human being. It is applicable to test methods for vehicle penetration distances not exceeding 25 m. This document is applicable to all manufacturers and procurers of VSBs, where they are used to protect people in any public or private location from the impact of vehicle attacks. This document does not apply to the performance of a VSB or its control apparatus when subjected to: — slow speed encroachment; — slow speed nudging and ramming; — blast explosion; — ballistic impact; — manual attack, with the aid of the vehicle (multiple impacts at slow speed); — manual attack, with the aid of tools (excluding vehicles); — electrical manipulation; — attack on the control systems by any means. NOTE 1 For manual attack, a variety of test methods exist. For assessing intruder resistance of building components, see LPS 1175. NOTE 2 The VSB is designed and tested on the basis of: a) vehicle type, mass and speed of the assessed vehicle-borne threat; b) its geographical application (e.g. climate conditions); c) intended site location (e.g. rigid or non-rigid soil/finished surface). It does not apply to guidance on design, the operational suitability of a VSB or other impact test methods. NOTE 3 Guidance on the selection and specification of a VSB by type and operational suitability is given in ISO 22343-2.

This document gives guidance on developing and maintaining security plans. The security plan describes how an organization establishes effective security planning and how it can integrate security within organizational risk management practices. This document is applicable to all organizations regardless of type, size and nature, whether in the private, public or not-for-profit sectors, that wish to develop effective security plans in a consistent manner. This document is applicable to any organization intending to implement measures designed to protect their assets against malicious acts and mitigate their associated risks. This document does not provide specific criteria for identifying the need to implement or enhance prevention and protection measures against malicious acts. It does not apply to services and operations delivered by private security companies.

This document provides guidelines to organizations for establishing the basic elements, strategies and processes for preventing and reducing crime and the fear of crime at a new or existing built environment. It recommends the establishment of countermeasures and actions to treat crime and security risks in an effective and efficient manner by leveraging environmental design. Within this document, the term "security" is used in a broad manner to include all crime, safety and security-specific applications, so it is applicable to public and private organizations, regardless of type, size or nature. While this document provides general examples of implementation strategies and best practices, it is not intended to provide an exhaustive listing of detailed design, architectural or physical security crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) implementation strategies or restrict the potential applications to only those examples provided in this document.

This document gives guidelines for the application of principles and a process for a complexity assessment of an organization's systems to improve security and resilience. A complexity assessment process allows an organization to identify potential hidden vulnerabilities of its system and to provide an early indication of risk resulting from complexity. This document is generic and applicable to all sizes and types of organization systems, such as critical assets, strategic networks, supply chains, industrial plants, community infrastructures, banks and business companies.